Search This Blog

Loading...

Thursday, December 31, 2009

Life in a Terror State

In Modern Times Paul Johnson chronicles the rise of the Soviet terror state.
"The arbitrary nature of the arrests was essential to create the climate of fear which, next to the need for labour, was the chief motive for the non-party terror. An OGPU [the Soviet secret police from 1922-34] man admitted to the Manchester Guardian Moscow correspondent that innocent people were arrested: naturally - otherwise no one would be frightened. If people, he said, were arrested only for specific misdemeanours, all the others would feel safe and so become ripe for treason." (Harperrenial, 2001, orig. pub. 1983, rev. 1991), pp. 274-275
I recently shared with a group my regret that many Americans are forgetting how monstrously evil communism is. Its record of mass enslavement and murder is unrivaled. Have you noticed young people sporting Che Guevara tee shirts? One friend commented: "You might as well wear one with Jeffrey Dahmer's face on it." He's right.

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

2010 Bible Reading Plans

My Dad read the Bible to me as a child at least once a day, and often twice. Ordinarily, days began and ended with prayer and Bible reading.
When I was 14 I attended a PCUS youth conference at Montreat, North Carolina. I purchased a read-through-the-Bible-in-a-year-plan, and began the habit of personal daily Bible reading, a habit which - if you don't already - I commend to you for 2010.
ESV.BIBLE has several excellent daily Bible reading plans. Regardless of which plan you use, I recommend reading the Psalms daily. I take my readings from the Book of Common Prayer Daily Lectionary. You will find psalms for the morning and evening. Be diligent, and you will read all the Psalms ever seven weeks. May you delight yourself in God's word in 2010!

Monday, December 28, 2009

"Foyle's War"

It took Lynne and me 18 months, but this year we finally finished watching the nineteen-episode BBC mystery series "Foyle's War." If you're a mystery buff, you'll like this series.
Christopher Foyle (Michael Kitchen), a 50-something widower, is detective chief superintendent on the southern coastal channel town of Hastings - the perfect setting for a this World War II period crime drama.
Where to begin?
First, Michael Kitchen is brilliant. His facial expressions communicate as much as his words, all delivered in that understated British way. He's now one of my favorite actors.
Then there are the by-the-book detective stories - a fixed number of suspects, never more than four or five, and Foyle's remarkable ability to appraise human character by careful observation and interrogation.
Every episode places the murder in the context of wartime England's tumultuous home front, and especially its seedier aspects - anti-semitism, pro-Nazi sympathizers, smugglers, black markets, spies, bombings, captured airmen, and the plight of law-abiding German immigrants as war fever rises in their host country.
Joining Foyle's law enforcement team are his young driver, Samantha Stewart (Honeysuckle Weeks) and Sgt. Milner, a soldier sent home after being wounded in Britain's Norway operations. If this were an American production, you could be certain that Foyle and Milner would compete for romantic rights to Miss Stewart. None of that happens here - from first to last, all three prove themselves to be professionally and morally upright.
My only complaint about the series? There were too few episodes.

Sunday, December 27, 2009

A Prayer for the Sunday After Christmas

ALMIGHTY God, who hast given us thy only-begotten Son to take our nature upon him, and as at this time to be born of a pure Virgin; Grant that we being regenerate, and made thy children by adoption and grace, may daily be renewed by thy Holy Spirit; through the same our Lord Jesus Christ, who liveth and reigneth with thee and the same Spirit, one God, world without end. Amen.
- 1662 Book of Common Prayer

Saturday, December 26, 2009

Obstinacy and Determination

"A weakness is the absence of a good quality; a flaw is the presence of a bad one. Everyone has flaws, and no one is ever rid of them all. . . . "[T]here are projects, or strategies, that should not be carried through, because they are mistaken or hopeless. Obstinacy is persisting beyond all reason. . . . "Obstinacy is the brother of determination. There is no easy way to tell them apart; in the heat of the moment, they can look and feel the same. But when the moment lengthens and lengthens, it becomes time to try some other way; the obstinate leader won't. Recognizing when it is time to let go takes experience, wisdom, and instinct. Some leaders are slow to see it; others see it too soon." Richard Brookhiser, George Washington Leadership, 213 and 217.

Thursday, December 24, 2009

The Incarnation

"And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth" (John 1:14, KJV).

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

2009 Christmas Eve Service

Dear Church Family, Each year I look forward to our Christmas Eve Service of Lessons and Carols, a special time devoted to the scriptures and hymns of Christmas. This year our kind brothers and sisters at Providence Baptist Church (1355 Douglass Road, Huntsville) are permitting us to use their beautiful sanctuary from 4-5pm on December 24. I hope you will make plans to be with us. In Christ’s Service, Charlie

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

The Church's Teaching Mission

"It shall come to pass in the latter days that the mountain of the house of the Lord shall be established as the highest of the mountains, and shall be lifted up above the hills; and all the nations shall flow to it, and many peoples shall come, and say: 'Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the God of Jacob, that he may teach us his ways and that we may walk in his paths.' For out of Zion shall go the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem." Isaiah 2:2-3
It was never God’s intention that the blessings of his grace remain confined to one family or nation. Remember his word to Abraham: “…in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.” (Genesis 12:2) Isaiah 2 paints a glorious picture of a river - a river not of water but of people - flowing up Zion to worship, and to hear God’s word taught. Seven hundred years later these words find the beginning of their fulfillment at Pentecost. Men and women from the nations of the world hear the gospel preached.
This vision presents the church in its vital, life-giving role of teaching God’s word. Teaching men and women so that they will walk in the Lord’s ways. E.J. Young captures this point so well:
“As a consequence of being taught, men want to walk in God’s ways. True doctrine places within one’s heart the desire to walk in the law of God. Truth leads to godliness, and when one has been truly instructed, he will want to do God’s will. . . . [O]ne must first be instructed before he can walk aright. Doctrine and ethics must go hand in hand. There can be no right obedience, nor can there be any right worship, until first one has learned of God.” [Edward J. Young, The Book of Isaiah, vol. 1 (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1965, rep. 1997), 105.
“What blinds the understanding of men is ignorance, and ignorance can only be dispelled by truth. Hence, the missionary and evangelistic activity of the church must be doctrinal in character.” (Young, 105)
The teaching ministry of God’s church proclaims a globally celebrated hope.

Monday, December 21, 2009

God with Us - Matthew 1:18-25

(A sermon from the Gospel according to Matthew, preached December 20, 2009.)

Matthew 1:18 Now the birth of Jesus Christ took place in this way. When his mother Mary had been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together she was found to be with child from the Holy Spirit. 19 And her husband Joseph, being a just man and unwilling to put her to shame, resolved to divorce her quietly. 20 But as he considered these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not fear to take Mary as your wife, for that which is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. 21 She will bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.” 22 All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet:

23 “Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel”

(which means, God with us). 24 When Joseph woke from sleep, he did as the angel of the Lord commanded him: he took his wife, 25 but knew her not until she had given birth to a son. And he called his name Jesus.[1]

A baby is born, and the happy couple sends out a birth announcement to tell friends and family.

But Jesus’ birth is different. His birth itself is an announcement – not from Mary and Joseph, but from God.[2]

Seven centuries before the birth of Jesus, God speaks through his prophet Isaiah the words found in “Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and they shall call his name Immanuel” (Matthew 1:23). And just in case our Hebrew is a little rusty, Matthew reminds us that the name Immanuel means “God with us.” Two thousand years ago, the faithful remnant of Israel despairs. Weighed down with their sins, and terrorized by wicked men who oppress their country and malign their faith. At the birth of Jesus, God announces, “I am with you in Jesus Christ.”

To believing men and women today, God makes his announcement: “I am with you in Jesus Christ.”

Let’s take a closer look at verse 23. “Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son.”

Some professing Christians have expressed skepticism about the virgin birth. One (William Barclay) writes: “[The virgin birth of Christ] is a doctrine which presents us with many difficulties; and our church does not compel us to accept it in the literal and physical sense. This is one of the doctrines on which the Church says that we have full liberty to come to our own conclusion.”

Sadly, this is the language of unbelief. Thankfully, it is a skepticism that our own Presbyterian church will not tolerate in its ministers.

Could Matthew be any clearer? Three times in these few verses he refers to the supernatural character of Jesus’ birth (18, 20, 23). Matthew, along with Luke, presents the virginal conception of Jesus as a historical fact. And why should this surprise us? The Bible is filled with supernatural events, not the least of which is the resurrection of Jesus from the dead. Why believe any of the Bible’s miraculous events, if we cannot believe this one? From beginning to end, from Genesis to Revelation, the Bible is a supernatural book about the supernatural acts of a supernatural God who announces that he is with his people, removing their sins and rescuing them from their enemies.

Six truths about the Virgin Birth:

1. The virgin birth demonstrates the humiliation of the Lord. The eternal Son of God lays aside the insignia of glory, and impoverishes himself, and is born in a dirty stable in a remote, filthy, and poor outpost of Roman occupied territory. My mind turns 2 Corinthians 8:9: “For you know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though he was rich, yet for your sake he became poor, so that you by his poverty might become rich.” His poverty, our riches; his suffering, our salvation; his humiliation, our exaltation.

2. The virgin birth explains how the eternal Son of God, the second person of the blessed Trinity, became human. He did not change from God to man, nor did he become a new kind of creature, a hybrid person, half God and half man. Rather, at the incarnation the One who is fully God remains fully God, and takes to himself a human nature, becoming fully man. Fully God and fully man, in one person, forever.

3. The virgin birth assures us of Christ’s complete sympathy. Like us all, his life began at conception and ended in death. Therefore, no experience of ours is outside his experience. This is why God did not send Jesus into the world a complete human being. In every stage of life, he suffered the same temptations we do, yet without sin.

4. The virgin birth makes possible Christ’s true humanity without original sin. Original sin does not mean the first human sin; it does not refer to Adam’s sin. Rather, original sin refers to the results of that first sin – death and condemnation. Adam sinned and we sinned in him; sin, death, and condemnation spread to all men. All men are from the time of their personal origin – their conception – sinners. We do not sin and then become sinners. We are born sinners; therefore, we sin. We are not born innocent, and then corrupted by our environment. We are born guilty. Christ our Savior comes from outside the natural descendants of Adam. He is holy, pure, and sinless, ready to meet the law’s demands as our representative and to offer himself as our substitutionary sacrifice on the cross.

5. The virgin birth points to the missionary Spirit of Christ. Christmas is a rescue mission. “The Son of Man came to seek and to save the lost” (Luke 19:10). To love missions is to be near the heartbeat of Christ.

6. The virgin birth is further confirmation that abortion is evil. Ethicist John Jefferson Davis writes, “The personal history of the Son of God on earth begins not when he was ‘born of the Virgin Mary,’ but when he was conceived by the Holy Spirit.’ His history, like ours, began at conception.”

Now let’s take a look at the role Joseph places in this birth that announces God’s presence with us.

Funny, isn’t it? All over the Christian world Roman Catholics carve statues of Mary; and the Orthodox make icons bearing her image. As Protestants, we object to the extreme veneration that leads Christians to pray to her, or to declare her sinless conception. Such notions are nowhere to be found in the Bible. Nevertheless, we rightly admire Mary’s devotion and praise the character of this woman God chose to bear the incarnate Christ in her womb.

But Joseph is almost forgotten. This shouldn’t be. After all, he was fully responsible for the child’s care and provision and upbringing, the marks of an honorable man.

He was also a man of action. He heeded the angel’s warning about murderous Herod, and took mother and child to the safety of Egypt. He then prudently decides his family would be safer in Galilee than Judea, and settles there. No angel pointed him to Galilee. He chose, and chose wisely for his family.

Joseph was a teacher, too. Did you know that? He guided young Jesus in learning the skills of a carpenter, and prepared him for the responsibilities of manhood. An exemplary father.

But what stands out so in Matthew 1 is his character. Mary was a woman of character; Joseph also was a man of character. A man and a woman can be attracted to each other for the first time by so many things – a smile, a laugh, physical attractiveness, a good time together. But relationships that count are built ultimately on character. People of character attract people of character. Whatever initially brought Joseph and Mary together is not known to us, but beyond question they esteemed each other as people of godly character.

But there relationship was put to the test. Here’s how.

We’re told in “When his mother Mary had been betrothed to Joseph” (Matthew 1:18). If you have a New International Version, you’ll notice that the word “betrothed” is translated “engaged.” I’d stick with betrothed; engaged does not do justice to this ancient practice. Joseph and Mary’s engagement is not like modern American engagements that are easily made and easily broken. In Joseph and Mary’s day, betrothal or engagement was a binding arrangement. The woman could be called “the wife of her fiancé” and the man the young lady’s “husband.” The arrangement could only be ended by divorce proceedings.[3] Obviously this was not a relationship taken lightly.

And it is these stringent rules of engagement that put Joseph and Mary’s relationship to the test. “When [Jesus] mother Mary had been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together she was found to be with child from the Holy Spirit” (Matthew 1:18).

You can imagine Joseph’s consternation. “Problem pregnancies” are not a modern phenomenon. Mary returns from an extended stay with her cousin Elizabeth, and what other conclusion can Joseph reach than that his fiancée has been unfaithful? It takes no great imagination to think of what ran through Joseph’s mind – deceit, betrayal, and scandal. Which leads to that delicate question, “What will the neighbors think?” And not just the neighbors – Joseph is a godly man – what does God think?

Verse 19 tells us that Joseph is “a just man.” He is student of God’s law and careful to observe it. He consciously lives his life coram deo, before the face of God. And, now, every appearance indicates those laws have been violated. What would God have him do? He opts for what would ordinarily be the right choice: he moves to end the engagement; he decides to divorce his fiancée, Mary.

But here in the middle of this heart-wrenching decision, he demonstrates that he is a man of grace. “And her husband Joseph, being a just man and unwilling to put her to shame, resolved to divorce her quietly” (Matthew 1:19). Here justice is joined to gentleness; righteousness and mercy meet. Often those who are most vocal in their defense of righteousness are most harsh toward those whose lives are blemished by sin. You know the spirit: condemn the sin and sinner too. Expose her misbehavior for the entire world to see. Make her a public example.

Not Joseph. He resolves to end the relationship quietly. Fearing that Mary has grievously wronged him, he still is unwilling to shame her; he resolves to divorce her quietly.

Joseph’s behavior is a wordless rebuke to our own self-righteous and hypercritical spirits. Maybe this letter to a pastor that published in Evangelical Times came from someone who witnessed the quiet righteousness of a man like Joseph.

Dear Pastor:

I am critically ill and I need you to pray for me. My problem is due to neglect on my part, and this neglect is primarily what has caused my critical condition.

My sickness is spiritual and the symptoms are as follows:

· I spend hours every evening on private entertainment and maybe ten or fifteen minutes on family devotion.

· I give much thought to the financial security of my children, and very little to their eternal security.

· I spend far too much time criticizing my brothers and sisters instead of using that time to lift them up in prayer.

· I apply far too many of your sermons to everyone around me, when in reality they should be applied to myself.

· I defend the honor of myself and my relatives in the boldest way, but become strangely mute in defense of the honor of my Lord.

Pastor, please pray for my healing before my sickness proves to be fatal.

A sin-sick soul

Joseph reaches his decision. He has reached carefully, thoughtfully. In verse 20, we are told “he considered these things. He does not lose his bearing. He does not unleash his anger on Mary, nor does he wallow in self-pity. He remains poised. He thinks. He thinks long, hard, and biblically. It is in this moment that the Lord’s angel appears, and says “Joseph, son of David, do not fear to take Mary as your wife, for that which is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.” Matthew 1:20-21 Ordinarily, the parents name the child. Not here. The angel does, and he gives to the child the name that identifies his destiny. “You shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins.” And Joseph awoke, and without trumpet or fanfare, he took Mary as his wife, and he loved, cherished, and protected her. He did his godly duty.

Joseph’s story is in one sense unrepeatable. God is on the move, bringing to pass the supernatural birth of the Savior of the world. He announces his presence to all who put their faith Jesus Christ. Jesus – Immanuel – God with us – to save us from our sins. Is he your Savior?

Joseph’s story is in one sense unrepeatable. But in another sense his story is repeated countless times as men and women gladly receive the announcement of a Savior, and then quietly go about their God-given duties. Joseph’s story is relived as we live lives marked by righteousness and make decisions governed by mercy. God is glorified as we love our spouses, care for our families, serve our churches, and work hard. In the words of Paul the Apostle, we “lead a peaceful and quiet life, godly and dignified in every way” (1 Timothy 2:2). Not much heroic about this. But God often chooses to glorify himself not by a few acts of bold witness and incredible courage, but by the cumulative effects of many small decisions we make to live by the biblical codes of righteousness and mercy. And these many small acts of obedience spread God’s word, advance his kingdom, honor his name, and nourish his people.

Thank God for the faithful testimony of his servant, Joseph.


[1] All Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version, copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved.

[2] I am indebted to Dr. Raymond C. Ortlund, Jr. for this insight located in a sermon he preached on Matthew 1:18-25.

[3] Leon Morris, The Gospel According to Matthew (InterVarsity, 1992), pp. 26-27.

Saturday, December 19, 2009

Being Present for Others

God with us in the person of Jesus is the profound message of the incarnation. And the church is at its best when we are with each other and for each other in Christ. Today we face many distractions that hinder face-to-face relationships. Media ecologists point out that our communications technologies are often biased towards distant communications, and against face-to-face communications. Each of us has only so much time a day to spend with others, and Americans are increasingly choosing to spend it, by cell phone and e-mail, with people who are physically absent. As a matter of fact, cell phone calls and text messages often cheapen the quality of the time we spend with those right in front of us. Think how often conversations are interrupted when we stop to field cell phone calls. I have known people in adjacent offices who choose to do most of their communication with each other by e-mail. The potential for emerging technologies to disincarnate gives the church a sterling opportunity to present a powerful alternative culture of embodied presence. I think of how many good things have happened to me while standing impatiently in checkout lines, when it's difficult to resist the temptation to whip out the cell phone and start talking. In one line, before the days of cell phones, I noticed a woman asking a cashier for discarded boxes. Unfortunately, all had been thrown in the compactor. I introduced myself to her, told her I was a Presbyterian minister, and if she wanted she could have the boxes in my storage closet. I guess I didn’t look too threatening, so she came down and got them. As it would happen, she was looking to reconnect with the Christian church after many years away, and just happened to be a good organist. I needed one, and she played at our church for the next few years. An opportunity in a checkout line, but I would have missed it chatting on the phone. How many people do we fail to help because we are distracted, even though they are right in front of us? How many times do we miss enriching time with loved ones, because even though we were physically present, our minds are far away? Be physically present for the joy and comfort of others.

Friday, December 18, 2009

Keep Watch on Yourself

Spiritual self-confidence is dangerous. When we are most confident, we are most likely to fall. Why? Because self-confidence blinds us to our own weaknesses. We don't see how spiritually vulnerable we are. Ralph Davis’s tells the story of John Sedgewick, one of the Union Army’s premiere generals during the Civil War. He was immensely popular with his men, who called him “Uncle John.” In May 1864, at the Spotsylvania Courthouse during the opening days of Grant’s Overland Campaign, he rode his horse, prodding his men to move to new positions. A sharpshooter fired on them from a mile a way. Men dove for cover, but not John Sedgewick. He spurred his men forward. “They couldn’t hit an elephant at that distance,” he shouted. At that moment a bullet struck him under the left eye, and he fell from his horse, dead. The general never knew what hit him. He never knew that the sniper was using a modern, long-range, British-made Whitworth sniper rifle. He never knew the rifle was fixed with a telescopic sight. (The Wisdom and the Folly: An Exposition of the Book of First Kings (Christian Focus, 2002, rep. 2003), pp. 339-340) Supremely confident John Sedgewick - blind to his vulnerability, blind to his enemy’s power: it cost him his life.
When someone succumbs to temptation and falls, we think, “That was foolish. He should have seen it coming.” Far wiser is it to recognize our weakness, and say, “Given the right set of circumstances and the wrongful desires in my own heart, I could easily have done the same. I must be on guard.”
Paul's admonition should never be far from our mind: "Brothers, if anyone is caught in any transgression, you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness. Keep watch on yourself, lest you too be tempted" (Galatians 6:1).

Thursday, December 17, 2009

How Little We Know

“The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.’’
- Friedrich Hayek

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

If

“If I do not give a friend ‘the benefit of the doubt,’ but put the worst construction instead of the best on what is said or done, then I know nothing of Calvary love." “If I take offence easily, if I am content to continue in a cool unfriendliness, though friendship be possible, then I know nothing of Calvary love.” “If a sudden jar can cause me to speak an impatient, unloving work, then I know nothing of Calvary love. (For a cup brimful of sweet water cannot spill even one drop of bitter water however suddenly jolted.)” “If I feel injured when another lays to my charge things that I know not, forgetting that my Sinless Savior trod this path to the end, then I know nothing of Calvary love.” “If I feel bitterly towards those who condemn me, as it seems to me, unjustly, forgetting that if they knew me as I know myself they would condemn me much more, then I know nothing of Calvary love.” Amy Carmichael If (London: Richard Clay and Company, 1953), 35-39.

Monday, December 14, 2009

Cornell’s Straight Flush by Tevi D. Troy, City Journal 13 December 2009

Cornell’s Straight Flush by Tevi D. Troy, City Journal 13 December 2009
Tevi D. Troy chronicles the 1968/69 student uprisings at Cornell University. School administrators lost their resolve, and surrendered their administrative and moral authority to students who should have been arrested, jailed and expelled. The Cornell uprisings were not isolated; similar incidents occurred in other parts of the country.
Regrettably, the events of forty years ago have left a ruinous intellectual tradition that continues. Troy concludes:
"But in fact, the violent student uprisings of the late 1960s and early seventies have left a legacy of political radicalism and intellectual feebleness that continues to haunt not only Cornell, but many of our best universities. The most troubling trends in academic life these past four decades—including the introduction of highly politicized new departments and disciplines, the casual acceptance of racial self-segregation and animosity, the burdens of political correctness, and the decline of core liberal education curricula—can be traced in large part to the surrender of authority by university administrators and faculty in the face of student radicalism.
"These days, administrators and professors are more likely to be former radicals themselves than to see the damage done by the student protest movement. Their celebration of the surrender of the American academy now shapes the next generation’s understanding of the events of that period and of the radical politicization of America’s great universities. To recover, the next generation of professors and academic administrators needs to hear the true story of the student uprisings and to rediscover the importance of a truly liberal education, now nearly forgotten after four long decades of false nostalgia."

More Than a Prophet

(A sermon from the Gospel according to Matthew, preached December 13, 2009.)

Matthew 11:2 Now when John heard in prison about the deeds of the Christ, he sent word by his disciples 3 and said to him, “Are you the one who is to come, or shall we look for another?” 4 And Jesus answered them, “Go and tell John what you hear and see: 5 the blind receive their sight and the lame walk, lepers are cleansed and the deaf hear, and the dead are raised up, and the poor have good news preached to them. 6 And blessed is the one who is not offended by me.”

11:7 As they went away, Jesus began to speak to the crowds concerning John: “What did you go out into the wilderness to see? A reed shaken by the wind? 8 What then did you go out to see? A man dressed in soft clothing? Behold, those who wear soft clothing are in kings’ houses. 9 What then did you go out to see? A prophet? Yes, I tell you, and more than a prophet. 10 This is he of whom it is written,

“‘Behold, I send my messenger before your face,

who will prepare your way before you.’

11:11 Truly, I say to you, among those born of women there has arisen no one greater than John the Baptist. Yet the one who is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.[i]

_______________

Don’t confuse your personal agenda with God’s. Often our prayers focus on our health (“please, no sickness, Lord”), our occupations (“a peaceful job, Lord, that’s what I need, and good compensation wouldn’t hurt”), and all our relationships humming right along (“let them be orderly and satisfying, Lord, without any hiccups or hitches”). Personal comfort is our agenda, and we wouldn’t mind if God made it his agenda, too.

Now I am not for a moment suggesting that our health, work and relationships aren’t important. Certainly, they are, and should be regular matters of prayer before our heavenly Father. But when most of our prayers are requests for our personal comfort, we have put front and center an objective that is not an ultimate, even penultimate, concern of God.

We don’t have to read too long in the Bible before we discover that God has other priorities for his people. Take Philippians 3:10, for example. There the apostle says that he wants to know Christ (amen!), and the power of his resurrection (amen!), and that he might “share in his sufferings, becoming like him in his death” (uh oh). Not that we didn’t have warning that Paul’s thoughts were tracking in this direction, for Philippians 1:29 reads: “For it has been granted to you that for the sake of Christ you should not only believe in him but also suffer for his sake.” Faith as a gift of God – no Presbyterian has any problem with that. Suffering as a divine gift . . . well, that’s a message we’re less than eager to hear.

In this morning’s text, we find John experiencing the cost of discipleship. Here’s his situation: You remember Herod the Great, vain and violent, a megalomaniac who, by arrangement with the Romans, ruled as king in Palestine from 37 to 4 B.C. You know him best as the mass murderer of Bethlehem, the tyrant who, in an unsuccessful attempt to kill the Christ child, ordered the execution of the village’s boys age two and under.

This Herod had a son. We know him as Herod Antipas, and let’s just say the apple didn’t fall far from the tree. Herod was ruler of Galilee and Perea. Married, he fell in love with his half-brother Philip’s wife, Herodias. Herodias dumped Philip and Herod Antipas dumped his wife, and the two divorcees married each other. Truly, a match made in hell, and John the Baptist was unsparing in his denunciation of Herod and Herodias’s adultery (Matthew 14:4). His faithfulness to biblical morality landed him in prison. He would not leave alive.

Jesus’ assessment of John is found in verse 11: “Truly, I say to you, among those born of women there has arisen no one greater than John the Baptist. Yet the one who is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.” So, John was a great man, perhaps the greatest man who ever lived. But we mustn’t forget where his greatness came from. His greatness did not come from his personality – or from his commendable courage – or from his formidable public speaking abilities. Instead, his greatness consisted of this: his divine calling and the God-given grace to remain true to it.

What was John’s calling? He was the forerunner of the Christ, sent to prepare his way. Several centuries earlier, the prophet Malachi spoke of John’s ministry,[ii] and in verse 10 Jesus quotes him: “This is he of whom it is written, ‘Behold, I send my messenger before your face, who will prepare your way before you.’” And so, John bore witness to the Christ, preparing his way, proclaiming his message of righteousness and judgment and repentance and forgiveness of sins. John was faithful to his calling.

But what had his faithfulness won for him? A year in prison, and I suspect Herod’s prison at the fortress of Machareus lacked the benefits of the American penal system; regular visits, three square meals a day, access to a fitness center, and cable television were not the lot of this prisoner’s life.

A year is a long-time to be locked up, and ample time for John to reflect and wonder if all his labors were for nothing. Doubt’s dark shadow crept over him.

Now let’s be clear here: roots sunk deeply in the soil of unbelief do not nourish John’s doubt. James warns about this kind of doubt: “the one who doubts is like a wave of the sea that is driven and tossed by the wind. For that person must not suppose he will receive anything from the Lord; he is a double minded man, unstable in all his ways” (James 1:6-8). This unstable man has a split personality – one moment he trusts God’s goodness, the next he doesn’t. He can’t make up his mind.

John’s doubt is of a different kind all together. He has testified that Jesus is the Christ. And was not one of the works of the Christ to overthrow the oppressor? Yet, Rome remains in Palestine, and John in prison. John has faithfully denounced Herod and Herodias’s affair. But Jesus hasn’t said a word about, and, if he’s really the Christ, why hasn’t he come to John’s aid?

We mustn’t sentimentalize persecution or ignore its demoralizing effect. It takes a toll on people, pushing people to the breaking point – or beyond. Yes, the faith of God’s people is often strengthened in times of testing, but the price is high. Our hearts must go out to those who suffer like John.

John’s doubt prompted him to send a delegation of his disciples to Jesus, and asked, “Are you the one who is to come, or shall we look for another?” (Matthew 11:3). John is confident that God will send the Messiah. His uncertainty is whether that Messiah is Jesus. Has he been mistaken?

Look at how Jesus handles John’s inquiry. He replies, “Go and tell John what you hear and see: the blind receive their sight and the lame walk, lepers are cleansed and the deaf hear, and the dead are raised up, and the poor have good news preached to them.” (Matthew 11:4-5) Jesus does not cite these great works just because they are miraculous. Working miracles is not in itself proof that he is Messiah; after all, others performed mighty miracles. But because each of these actions – giving sight to the blind, mobility to the lame, healing to the leper, hearing to the deaf, life to the dead, and the gospel to the poor – were actions that Isaiah the prophet attributed to the coming Messiah.[iii] It’s as if Jesus is saying, “John, you know your Bible, you know what it says about me. Have faith.”

What trips John up is the fact that while Jesus does many works that the scriptures foretold the Christ would do, he is not doing one of his most important works – executing judgment on the enemies of God and his people. That’s John’s broad concern. And, of course, a more immediate and personal concern: Jesus has not lifted a finger to alleviate John’s suffering.

Doesn’t John set for us a wonderful example of dealing with honest doubt? He takes them to the Lord. We can let doubt fester, or we can own up to it, and talk about it openly and respectfully with our fellow servants in the Lord. Doubt left lurking in the heart and never talked about is spiritually crippling. We have much to learn from John’s honest confrontation of doubt.

In his suffering, John must exercise faith. He has sufficient evidence that Jesus is the Messiah. He must believe. He must take Jesus at his word: “blessed is the one who is not offended by me” (Matthew 11:6). John must persevere, and given his position in a prison fortress, death looming, this is no small feat.

John must have faith in God’s word. So must we. But on this side of the cross, we are in a much better position to understand God’s agenda than John. John was thrilled by Jesus’ saving work, but at the same time perplexed by his refusal to execute final judgment. John was perplexed but we shouldn’t be perplexed nearly so much, for we know that there are two appearances of the Old Testament’s promised Messiah, a truth much more apparent in our day than John’s.

At his first advent, the Messiah came to die for the sins of his people, to offer himself as an atoning sacrifice to turn away God’s wrath. Only at his second advent does he come to bring final judgment upon evildoers. So, Christ’s second coming is “delayed” until all for whom Christ died are brought to faith. We live in an era of grace. Here’s how Peter sums it up: “the Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should reach repentance.” But that day of grace will not last forever. Peter continues, “the day of the Lord will come like a thief” (2 Peter 3:9-10).

John’s great duty and privilege was to be the last of the Old Testament prophets. All spoke of Christ and his coming. John’s honor was to be closest to the event he prophesied, and to have his ministry spoken of by the prophets. But with honor of testifying to a suffering Messiah came the responsibility of suffering for the Messiah.

Jesus loves John, and will not permit his suffering to be in vain. He will not let anyone look on John’s suffering, and draw the conclusion that John is a failure. He will not permit them to equate imprisonment with a lack of God’s blessing. So Jesus asks the crowd who witnessed his reply to John’s disciples: “What did you go out into the wilderness to see? A reed shaken by the wind?” (Matthew 11:7) No one went to the remote banks of the Jordan to hear John preach because they thought him a spineless wimp. Jesus continues, “What then did you go out to see? A man dressed in soft clothing? Behold, those who wear soft clothing are in kings’ houses.” (Matthew 11:8) No one went to hear John because he was a whimpering sycophant, groveling at the feet of the king, saying whatever the king wanted to hear. No, they went to hear a man of boldness and courage and honor. More than that, they came to hear a prophet.

But not even the title prophet does justice to John. Jesus asks, “What then did you go out to see? A prophet? Yes, I tell you, and more than a prophet. This is he of whom it is written, ‘Behold, I send my messenger before your face, who will prepare your way before you.’” (Matthew 11:9-10) Like all God’s prophets, John spoke the very word of God, and testified to the coming Christ. Unlike the other prophets, John himself was the subject of prophesy, his own ministry foretold by Malachi, through whom the Lord said: “Behold, I send my messenger before your face, who will prepare your way before you.” John was more than a prophet.

John has not suffered in vain. He suffered because he was a faithful witness to the truth, and faithfully delivered God’s message of repentance. His suffering has not gone unnoticed by Jesus. Jesus knows, and he commends John to the crowds.

You may be tempted in your suffering to conclude that your faith is in vain. More than one Christian has told me that his suffering has caused him to conclude that he is “outside” the will of God.

Listen carefully: You’re not in a prison cell like John, but you feel that because he has not released you from your place of suffering that he is displeased with you. Nothing could be further from the truth. God takes his best servants, like John, and calls upon them to witness to the truth of the gospel in the most trying places. Are you suffering? God has called you to make your place of suffering an arena in which you testify to his grace. Don’t be ashamed. Don’t believe the Lord has neglected you. He says to you, “blessed is the one who is not offended by me.”

John the Baptist was a great man. He should have a place in your spiritual Hall of Fame. But in one sense you are even greater. That’s Jesus affirmation in verse 11: “Truly, I say to you, among those born of women there has arisen no one greater than John the Baptist. Yet the one who is least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he.” That can’t mean that you’ve achieved more than he did, or that your courage exceeds his, or that your mission is more important than his was. What it does mean is that your privileges are greater, far greater, than his. John could only testify to the coming one. He could only point to the Messiah’s coming kingdom.

But you have the privilege of knowing the crucified, risen and ascended Christ, of communing with him in prayer, of knowing the full story of his dying love for sinners, and of experiencing his resurrection power. John could not know Christ in the same way.

John could look to a coming kingdom. You’re in the kingdom, and the least member of the kingdom of God experiences more of God’s grace than John could ever have imagined.

God’s agenda, which takes precedence over the comfort of his servant, is the message of repentance and grace proclaimed to a hostile and fiercely resistant world. John was a faithful messenger, and he suffered for his loyalty to God and his Christ.

God’s agenda is not our personal comfort, but that the message of his love for sinners be proclaimed to every person. Often he places us, his servants, in difficult places, some even more difficult than John’s. So our suffering should never bring us shame. We should never conclude that God has neglected or forgotten us. Though he may seem distant to us, his Fatherly grip of grace never releases us. We are messengers of his grace. May our ears ever be open to the words of our Savior: “blessed is the one who is not offended by me.” With another of God’s suffering servants may we affirm: “For it has been granted to you that for the sake of Christ you should not only believe in him but also suffer for his sake.”


[i] All Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version, copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved.

[ii] See Malachi 3:1.

[iii] See Isaiah 26:18-19; 29:18-19, 35:5-6, 53:4, and 61:1.

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Having Our Own Way

"And, certainly, the mistakes we male and female mortals make when we have our own way might fairly raise some wonder that we are so fond of it."
- George Eliot, Middlemarch (Signet: 2003, orig. pub. 1874), 76.

Saturday, December 12, 2009

John Piper on Raising Children

John Piper asks: "Why require unregenerate children to act like they're good?" Three answers:
"1) For children, external, unspiritual conformity to God’s commanded patterns of behavior is better than external, unspiritual non-conformity to those patterns of behavior.
"2) Requiring obedience from children in conformity with God’s will confronts them with the meaning of sin in relation to God, the nature of their own depravity, and their need for inner transformation by the power of grace through the gospel of Christ.
"3) The marks of devotion, civility, and manners ('please,' 'thank you,' and good eye contact) are habits that, God willing, are filled later with grace and become more helpful ways of blessing others and expressing a humble heart."
Read the entire article. This is a thoughtful meditation that provides helpful guidance to parents and teachers.

Friday, December 11, 2009

D.A. Carson on the Doctrine of Hell

How can God be loving yet send people to hell? from A Passion for Life on Vimeo.

Does the Recession Strengthen Marriages?

Few Americans are happy about our economic recession. Job loss, shrinking retirement accounts, and diminished home values are never pleasant. But has the recession contributed to the strengthening of marriages? In some case, yes, argues W. Bradford Wilcox. Consider one example:
"[T]he recession has encouraged Americans to rediscover the virtue of thrift. After running up a record $988 billion in credit-card debt in 2008, Americans have cut $90 billion from their bills. They are also eating at home more often. The National Restaurant Association reports that inflation-adjusted restaurant sales fell in 2008 for the first time in about 40 years.
"All this is good for marriage because debt corrodes the marital bond, whereas assets solidify it. According to research by Jeffrey Dew at Utah State University, newly married couples who ran up their credit cards spent less time together, fought more and had significantly lower levels of marital happiness compared with couples who did not accrue such debt. By contrast, couples with financial assets (savings, investments, and the net value of a home) are markedly less likely to experience problems, largely because wives are happier and more likely to stick with their marriages when they share such assets with their husbands. Mr. Dew found, for instance, that couples without assets were 70% more likely to divorce than couples with $10,000 in financial assets."
Furthermore, according to Wilcox, couples are discovering that the benefits of financial security and extended family are not matters of secondary importance.
"[T]oday's 'tough times' seem to be reminding a large minority of couples that marriage is not only about an intense, continuing emotional connection.
"This marks a departure from the past four decades, when many Americans came to see marriage largely as a chance to pursue a 'soulmate' relationship, where couples focus on emotional intimacy, sexual satisfaction and personal fulfillment, rather than as a chance to share childbearing and childrearing and economic cooperation with an extended family. . .
"Today spouses are rediscovering the value of a husband with a good health-care plan, a wife with a good job or in-laws who are willing to provide free child care or a temporary rent-free place to live. In other words, Americans are rediscovering the power that family ties have to carry them—financially, socially and emotionally—through tough times."

Thursday, December 10, 2009

39 - Sermons on Paul's Letter to the Romans (10:14-21)

(The thirty-ninth in a series of sermons on Paul's Letter to the Romans, preached December 6, 2009.)

Romans 10:14 How then will they call on him in whom they have not believed? And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard? And how are they to hear without someone preaching? 15 And how are they to preach unless they are sent? As it is written, “How beautiful are the feet of those who preach the good news!” 16 But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Isaiah says, “Lord, who has believed what he has heard from us?” 17 So faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ.

10:18 But I ask, have they not heard? Indeed they have, for “Their voice has gone out to all the earth, and their words to the ends of the world.”

10:19 But I ask, did Israel not understand? First Moses says, “I will make you jealous of those who are not a nation; with a foolish nation I will make you angry.” 10:20 Then Isaiah is so bold as to say, “I have been found by those who did not seek me; I have shown myself to those who did not ask for me.”

10:21 But of Israel he says, “All day long I have held out my hands to a disobedient and contrary people.”[i]

____________________

Why preach? Quite simply: because the salvation of men and women depends upon it. Look at verse 17: “faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ.” I take the word of Christ to mean the word about Christ, that is, the gospel. Sinful men and women are saved as they hear and believe the gospel of Christ – of the God-man’s death on the cross to redeem us from sin and reconcile us to God. No price was sufficient to discharge our debt of sin except the blood of Christ, the holy Son of God. For us, and for our salvation he came into the world. As the word about Christ is heard and believed, men and women are saved.

And hearing the gospel of Christ has everything to do with preaching. Preaching is the ordinary means by which God rescues men and women from their sins. Just look at the four questions found in 14 and 15, which culminate in the sending of preachers:

· “How then will they call on him in whom they have not believed?”

· “And how are they to believe in him of whom they have never heard?”

· “And how are they to hear without someone preaching?”

· “And how are they to preach unless they are sent?”

To highlight the prominence of preaching, John Stott reverses the order: God sends preachers, men and women hear, hearers believe, and believers call on the Lord and are saved.[ii] No preachers, no hearers; no hearers no believers; no believers, no salvation. God’s estimation of faithful preachers is found in verse 15. Paul cites Isaiah: “How beautiful are the feet of those who preach the good news!” (Isaiah 52:7)

What is a preacher? A preacher is a herald of God’s gospel, a messenger of God’s good news about Christ. In ancient times, before the invention of the press and modern media technologies, the herald played a key role in communicating vital news to a community. He stood in the public square and shouted message of the imperial authority. The herald never invented his own message, but was always a man under authority, sent to speak only the words given to him.[iii] No true herald thundered trivialities. His message was urgent, and his behavior and speech consistent with the dignity of the one who sent him.

Last week our president made his case for sending more troops to Afghanistan. He looked serious, spoke seriously, and dressed with the dignity the occasion demanded. War is deadly serious business.

But let an American president come before the West Point cadets and television cameras in jeans and a tee shirt, and he’ll be scorned. Let him perch on a bar stool, sipping coffee from a mug, beginning his speech on terrorism with a few humorous anecdotes, and he will be rebuked for a lack of propriety. Let him hurriedly slap a few lines together, his poor preparation obvious, and an appalled nation will jeer him. Speaking to a nation about war is deadly serious business.

And preaching is even more serious. The eternal souls of men and women hang in the balance. When the preacher proclaims the good news, he calls on men and women to end their rebellion against God, lay down their arms, confess Christ, and be reconciled to God in him. Therefore, the preacher is neither an entertainer nor a showman. He’s not a storyteller hired to generate warm feelings. He’s not the congregational therapist, charged with soothing the frustrations of contemporary life. No, he’s sent to deliver the urgent message of God’s gospel.

God sends preachers. But his calling of preachers is not willy-nilly, without rhyme or reason. He doesn’t randomly select men from the phonebook, and overnight transform them into preachers. Instead, he calls preachers through his church, and their preparation takes much prayer, discipline and time. It’s in the church that those men whom God calls learn the Christian faith, and their gifts are cultivated. It is where they learn to pray, to study, to serve. And after an appropriate time of training and preparation, it is the church that sends those God calls as preachers to proclaim the good news of Christ. The church prepares and sends preachers; it has no more important duty.

In your bulletin this morning, you’ll find information about next month’s theology conference. Our good friend Dave Gordon will visit us again and speak on “Why Johnny Can’t Preach.” He’ll add his voice to those who observe a scarcity of competent preaching in American churches. And he’ll help our church think about what we must do to prepare men to preach – what habits of learning we must cultivate, what gospel commitments we must cherish. It doesn’t matter whether you’re a preacher or if anyone from your family is a preacher – it is the responsibility of the whole church to be a part of the prayerful preparation of preachers.

So, preaching is front and center in today’s text. Why preach? It is God’s ordinary method of rescuing men and women from their sins. Preachers proclaim the gospel and people hear. But as always, in chapters 9-11, Paul’s agony over the hardness of his fellow Israelites to the preaching of the gospel is never far from his mind and saddens him. So it is here. Preachers are sent, “[b]ut they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Isaiah says, ‘Lord, who has believed what he has heard from us?’” (Romans 9:16) Paul has in mind Israel, and its obstinacy. Hearing the gospel is not enough to save. To be saved one must hear and believe, something that most of Paul’s kinsmen will not do. Israel has heard the message of the gospel: “But I ask, have they not heard? Indeed they have, for ‘Their voice has gone out to all the earth, and their words to the ends of the world.’” (Romans 10:18; see Psalm 19:4). Israel has heard but not believed.

Not only has Israel heard the gospel, they have understood through the Old Testament exactly the situation in which they find themselves in Paul’s day – hardened against the gospel even as multitudes of Gentiles hear and believe. “But I ask, did Israel not understand? First Moses says, ‘I will make you jealous of those who are not a nation; with a foolish nation I will make you angry.’ Then Isaiah is so bold as to say, ‘I have been found by those who did not seek me; I have shown myself to those who did not ask for me.’” (Romans 10:19-20; see Deuteronomy 32:21 and Isaiah 65:1).

So, Israel, who claimed to know God, resists the gospel even as Gentiles, who did not seek God, hear and enthusiastically receive the gospel of Christ. But it’s not as if Israel was not invited to believe. Look at verse 21. Citing Isaiah, Paul reveals God’s stance toward Israel: “All day long I have held out my hands to a disobedient and contrary people” (Isaiah 65:1).

God was patient toward unbelieving Israel. Sometime try standing, holding out your arms, and see how long you can keep them raised. Before too long, they will feel like they weigh a ton, and they’ll fall to your side.[iv] Yet day after day, year after year, century after century, God extended his welcoming hands to a people who despised his chastening and refused his overtures of grace. And through the preaching of the gospel, God’s hands are extended to you; he is ready to receive any who turn to him in repentance and faith.

As we wrap up our studies of Romans 9 and 10, two things impress me.

First, don’t think you have to make a choice between divine election and human responsibility. Both are taught side-by-side in scripture: God’s election in Romans 9:6-29, and our human responsibility to believe the gospel in Romans 9:30-10:21. We do well to adopt the attitude of Charles Simeon, the great Anglican minister: “When I come to a text which speaks of election, I delight myself in the doctrine of election. When the apostles exhort me to repentance and obedience, and indicate my freedom of choice and action, I give myself up to that side of the question.”[v] Ignore the doctrine of predestination, and you will have a deficient view of God’s character and grace. Ignore the doctrine of human responsibility, and you will find yourself excusing your sinful choices and denying personal responsibility for your actions. The Bible is united in its testimony both to divine election and human responsibility. Let the Bible’s testimony be yours, too.

Second, prize preaching. Preaching is not just one activity of the church; it is its very life-blood. If a church’s preaching is not faithful, it fails at its central task, and everything else it does is no value to the kingdom of God because it will be a church with its ear closed to God’s word.

The landscape of Christian history is littered with once faithful churches that have lost their way. As different as these churches are from one another, their demise all have in common one thing: at some point the congregation settled for less than faithful preaching of the word of Christ. Don’t let that story become yours. Pray for faithful preaching, expect faithful preaching, demand serious and earnest preachers. After all, faith comes in one way and one way only: “faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ” (Romans 10:17).


[i] All Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version, copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved.

[ii] John Stott, Romans: God’s Good News for the World (InterVarsity: 1994), 286

[iii] Stott, 286, and Leon Morris, The Epistle to the Romans (Eerdmans, 1988), 390.

[iv] For this illustration, I am indebted to James Montgomery Boice, Romans (3): God and History (Baker: 1993), 1278.

[v] Stott, 278.